Sandoz v. Cingular Wireless, L.L.C.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 256
Relies on Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa · California v. ARC America Corp. · Holland v. Florida · Holland v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a narrow exception ... that should be 'applied sparingly.' " See Sandoz v. Cingular Wireless, L.L.C. , 700 Fed.Appx. 317 , 320 (5th Cir. 2017). In order for the exception to apply, a plaintiff must show "(1) that he has been pursuing his rights diligently, and (2) that some extraordinary circumstance stood in his way and prevented timely filing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.