Dash v. Wayne’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2014
1 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Jones v. Johnson · Ai v. Frank Huff Agency, Ltd. · 6 Haw. App. 125 - Eastern Star, Inc. v. Union Building Materials Corp. · Carlson v. Coca-Cola Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“neither the language of the statute itself nor the legislative history regarding the amendment give any expressed indication that this statute should be applied retroactively.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.