TADCO Construction Corp. v. Dormitory Authority’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Graham v. Connor · Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati · Owens v. Okure
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“they can also be brought against individuals other than the arresting officer when such a person actively engaged in a plaintiff's prosecution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“play[s] an active role in the prosecution, such as giving advice and encouragement or importuning the authorities to act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“TADCO has failed to adequately allege the stigma required to establish a stigma-plus liberty interest deserving of due process protection.”). As noted, they appropriately have not renewed their assertion of a claim for deprivation of a liberty interest here. . There is one further threshold issue. Defendants argue that issue preclusion prevents plaintiffs from”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.