Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 700 FSUPP2D 599 - Stephenson v. Citco Group Ltd.

Stephenson v. Citco Group Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

1 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Hanna v. Plumer · Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Any fraud, deception, concealment, suppression, false pretense or fictitious or pretended purchase or sale; (b) Any promise or representation as to the future which is beyond reasonable expectation or unwarranted by existing circumstances; (c) Any representation or statement which is false, where the person who made such representation or statement: (i) knew the truth; or (ii) with reasonable effort could have known the truth; or (iii) made no reasonable effort to ascertain the truth; or (iv) did not have knowledge concerning the representation or statement made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The idea of shareholders having directly enforceable rights as third party beneficiaries to corporate contracts is, I think, one that should be resisted. One of the consequences of limited liability that shareholders enjoy is that the law treats corporations as legal persons not simply agents for shareholders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[m]ost New York courts have ... held that the [Martin] Act precludes a private right of action for common law claims the subject matter of which is covered by the Martin Act.... The federal courts have, almost without exception, adopted the same position.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.