Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 700 P.2d 777 - Gronski v. State

Gronski v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2022

15 state decisions

8019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · United States v. Leon · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Cherek v. United States · White v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he decision to revoke probation lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * The evidence utilized by the district court in making the decision to revoke probation need not establish the violation of the conditions of probation beyond a reasonable doubt, and the usual rules of evidence need not be applied.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The great majority of courts which have ruled on this question have held that evidence obtained by illegal search and seizure is admissible in a probation revocation hearing even though it would be inadmissible in a criminal prosecution. See Annotation, Admissibility, in State Probation Revocation Proceedings, of Evidence Obtained through Illegal Search and Seizure, 77 A.L.R.3d 636 , 641 (1977).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.