¶1After a careful review of the entire record in this case, we reject the appellant’s argument that his conviction herein was barred by collateral estoppel. Nevertheless, we reverse the appellant’s conviction and remand this ease to the trial court for a new trial because the record does not reveal that the appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to a trial by jury. See State v. Upton, 658 So.2d 86 (Fla.1995).
700 So. 2d 101
Miller v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 7, 1997
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-10-07
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1997
1 state decisions
Relies on 658 So. 2d 86 - State v. Upton
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1997-10-07
View the full empirical analysis of this case →