700 So. 2d 33 - Cole v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2017
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 513 So. 2d 1057 - Florida Bar v. Hosner · 694 So. 2d 686 - Van Poyck v. State · 507 So. 2d 1122 - Williams v. State · Cole v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall not represent a client if the lawyer's exercise of independent professional judgment in the representation of that client may be materially limited by the lawyer's . . . own interest,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“counsel's [alleged] unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lanier v. State“[a] trial strategy to do nothing ... is not an acceptable one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.