Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 700 So. 2d 384 - Green v. State

700 So. 2d 384 - Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2016

7 state decisions

50199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 685 So. 2d 773 - Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc. · 672 So. 2d 30 - Goins v. State · 688 So. 2d 392 - Neal v. State · 675 So. 2d 1374 - Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(g) & Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 · Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere may otherwise directly appeal only (i) the lower tribunal's lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (ii) a violation of the plea agreement, if preserved by a motion to withdraw plea; (iii) an involuntary plea, if preserved by a motion to withdraw plea; (iv) a sentencing error, if preserved; or (v) as otherwise provided by law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Hall v. State · 783 So. 2d 1191 - Gafford v. State
  2. “if his situation ... constitutes a sentence in excess of the plea bargain, his claim is cognizable in this appeal because the amendments to Rules 9.140 and 3.170 requiring him to file a motion to withdraw were not effective at the time he was sentenced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Hall v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.