Chambers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2011
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McNew v. State · Davenport v. State · Baehr v. State · Banks v. State · Russell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e hold that the double jeopardy provisions of the Texas and the United States constitutions are not offended when evidence used in a successful or unsuccessful attempt to revoke “regular” probation or deferred adjudication probation is later used to prosecute the defendant in a different case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Manning v. State · Ex Parte Tarver““It is not proper for a court to single out certain testimony and comment on it. To do so constitutes an improper comment on the weight of the evidence.” (Citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Courtney v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.