Siple v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2011
1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Williams v. United States · State v. Roth · Sanders v. State · United States v. Jones · Sullivan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he purpose of the habitual offender statute is to separate civilized society from individuals who have demonstrated their incorrigibility by repeatedly being incarcerated, released, and convicted of subsequent criminal offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stanley v. State“unconstitutionality; factual predicates which are either false, impermissible, or lack minimum indicia of reliability; judicial vindictiveness, bias, or sentencing with a `closed mind;' and any other illegality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martini v. State“set forth with particularity the reasons for the deviation”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martini v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.