Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 F.2d 1181 - No. 81-1377

No. 81-1377’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2008

5 state decisions

70198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Imbler v. Pachtman · Pierson v. Ray · Butz v. Economou · Stump v. Sparkman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a judge’s duty to decide all cases within his jurisdiction that are brought before him, including controversial cases that arouse the most intense feelings in the litigants. His errors may be corrected on appeal, but he should not have to fear that unsatisfied litigants may hound him with litigation charging malice or corruption. Imposing such a burden on judges would contribute not to principled and fearless decision-making, but to intimidation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Sixth Circuit has concluded that in light of the encouragement of arbitration and the necessity for arbitrators to facilitate the policy,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`it follows that the common law rule protecting arbitrators from suit ought not only be affirmed, but, if need be expanded.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.