Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 F.2d 256 - Penner v. Schweiker

Penner v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

701 F.2d 256 · 1983

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
November 2015
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Harper v. Bowen (1987), Evans v. Chater (1997)

22 federal appellate · 9 district ·

2701983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Califano v. Sanders · McGowen v. Harris · Parker v. Califano · Matos v. Secretary of Health

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any individual, after any final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing to which he was a party, ... may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Secretary may allow.” 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Once such a determination is made, the district court will have a sufficient record before it to decide what relief, if any, is consonant with due process and the Secretary's regulatory scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.