Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 F.2d 556 - Nilsen v. City of Moss Point

Nilsen v. City of Moss Point’s Empirical Analysis

701 F.2d 556 · 1983

Citation profile

348
cited by 348 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

146 federal appellate · 6 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 348 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education (1984), Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. (1998)

146 federal appellate · 6 district · 38 state decisions — followed in 16 states

134019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 348 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'For a prior judgment to bar an action on the basis of res judicata, the parties must be identical in both suits, the prior judgment must have been rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, there must have been a final judgment on the merits and the same cause of action must be involved in both cases.'”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “bars all claims that were or could have been advanced in support of the cause of action on the occasion of its former adjudication, ... not merely those that were adjudicated.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “part of the [same] transaction, or series of connected transactions, out of which”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.