Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Board of Trade’s Empirical Analysis
701 F.2d 653 · 1983
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2018 · most notably Camreta v. Greene Ex Rel. S. G. (2011), Camreta v. Greene (2011)
50 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 7 U.S.C. § 1 (CFTC Reauthorization Act of 1995) · 7 U.S.C. § 7B
Relies on United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · North Carolina v. Rice · Sullivan v. United States · California v. Southland Royalty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The reason for vacating a lower court's decision when the case becomes moot pending appeal is to make sure that a decision of which the losing party was denied appellate review will not have preclusive effect in subsequent litigation between the parties.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] dismissal for mootness is a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the circumstances make it likely that the findings are accurate [and] reliable”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.