Vasquez v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
701 F.2d 733 · 1983
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Brand v. Secretary of Department of Health Education and Welfare · McMillian v. Schweiker · Tennant v. Schweiker · Janka v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The credibility of a medical opinion is particularly suspect when it is based on incomplete evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Heckler · Woolf v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.