Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 F.2d 737 - Bates v. United States

Bates v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

701 F.2d 737 · 1983

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2004

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

70198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)

Relies on Stencel Aero Engineering Corporation v. United States · Alvado v. General Motors Corp. · Haehl v. Wabash Railroad · Bonnie J. Bissell v. Edmond J. McElligott Etc., Sylvia Lynn Gampher v. Edmond J. McElligott Etc. · Butler Ex Rel. Butler v. Circulus, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.