Duke v. Langdon’s Empirical Analysis
701 F.2d 768 · 1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2013
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Schweiker v. Hansen · Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. Sheehan · Kelly v. Railroad Retirement Board · Mabey v. Reagan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no legitimate claim of entitlement to continued employment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.