Reynolds v. McCall’s Empirical Analysis
701 F.2d 810 · 1983
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2018
20 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Brown v. Lundgren · Rifai v. United States Parole Commission · Shahid v. Crawford · Bowles v. Tennant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); cf. Reynolds v. McCall , 701 F.2d 810 , 812 (9th Cir. 1983) ("We have held that the federal parole statute creates, at most, a liberty interest entitled to no more protection of due process than that the Supreme Court held to apply to the Nebraska parole statute in Greenholtz .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f an offense behavior can be classified under more than one category, the most serious applicable category is to be used.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miles v. Rison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.