Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 F.2d 819 - United States v. Doe

United States v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis

701 F.2d 819 · 1983

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably United States v. Fouche (1985), United States v. Male Juvenile (1997)

52 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

2501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5032 · 18 U.S.C. § 5033 · 18 U.S.C. § 5038 · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Gault · Davis v. Mississippi · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania · Streeter v. United States · Cass v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[tlhe agents were extremely busy the day Doe was taken into custody, and they had to give priority to more urgent cases, including a woman in late pregnancy”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[r]easonable efforts should be made to notify the parents of any juvenile taken into custody. For those juveniles whose parents live outside the United States, if it is not feasible to notify a parent or guardian, the government could alternatively notify a foreign consulate in the United States.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the arresting officer . . . shall immediately notify . . . the juvenile's parents, guardian, or custodian of such custody. The arresting officer shall also notify the parents, guardian, or custodian of the rights of the juvenile and of the nature of the alleged offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.