Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 F.3d 1206 - United States v. Wolfe

United States v. Wolfe’s Empirical Analysis

701 F.3d 1206 · 2012

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Pasquantino v. United States · United States v. Francis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the nature and seriousness of the misconduct; (2) the extent to which the comments were invited by the defense; (3) the extent to which any prejudice was ameliorated by the court's instruction to the jury; (4) the defense's opportunity to counter any prejudice; and (5) the weight of the evidence supporting the conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “First, we consider whether the challenged remark was improper, and second, whether the remark deprived the defendant of a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.