Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 F.3d 274 - United States v. Mann

United States v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis

701 F.3d 274 · 2012

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2332A (§ 60023 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5845 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Zafiro v. United States · United States v. Lane · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An indictment adequately states an offense if ‘it contains all of the essential elements of the offense charged, fairly informs the defendant of the charges against which he must defend, and alleges sufficient information to allow a defendant to plead a conviction or acquittal as a bar to a subsequent prosecution. An indictment will ordinarily be held sufficient unless it is so defective that it cannot be said, by any reasonable construction, to charge the offense for which the defendant was convicted.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A defendant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence in a conspiracy case has a heavy burden.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “internally inconsistent or implausible on its face”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.