FSLIC v. Landry’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (Indian Claims Limitation Act of 1982)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Summerlin · Fontenot v. Upjohn Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'shall be void even though the personal representative has recognized such claim or demand by paying a portion thereof or interest thereon or otherwise.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.