Hardy v. Fischer’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Wilkinson Director Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al. v. Dotson et al. · Lane v. Williams · Hill v. United States ex rel. Wampler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n ongoing constitutional violation more closely resembles irreparable injury than does a constitutional violation that was suffered in the past and which can be remedied only by money damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“denial of the motion for injunctive relief moot[ed] the motion for certification of an injunctive class.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garnett v. Zeilinger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.