Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 NW2D 763 - Carrillo v. Fabian

Carrillo v. Fabian’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2018

13 state decisions

8020052010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]irst, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “involving allegations of fraud or other quasi-criminal wrongdoing ... because the defendant's interests at stake in those cases are more substantial than those present in a typical civil case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “instruct[s] the fact finder on the degree of confidence our society desires the fact finder to have in the correctness of his or her conclusions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.