Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 P2D 1139 - Hamlin v. Transcon Lines

Hamlin v. Transcon Lines’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Krenning v. Heart Mountain Irrigation District (2009), Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Curry (1989)

25 state decisions

1301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGuire v. McGuire · Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow Committee · DeHerrera v. Herrera · Oroz v. Board of County Com'rs of Carbon County · Yeik v. Department of Revenue & Taxation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The Wyoming legislature recognizes the inherently unfair and inequitable results which occur in the strict application of the doctrine of governmental immunity and is cognizant of the Wyoming Supreme Court decision of Oroz v. Board of County Commissioners, 575 P.2d 1155 (1978). It is further recognized that the state and its political subdivisions as trustees of public revenues are constituted to serve the inhabitants of the state of Wyoming and furnish certain services not available through private parties and, in the case of the state, state revenues may only be expended upon legislative appropriation. This act is adopted by the legislature to balance the respective equities between persons injured by governmental actions and the taxpayers of the state of Wyoming whose revenues are utilized by governmental entities on behalf of those taxpayers. This act is intended to retain any common law defenses which a defendant may have by virtue of decisions from this or other jurisdictions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) A governmental entity and its public employees while acting within the scope of duties are granted immunity from liability for any tort except as provided by W.S. 1-39-105 through 1-39-112.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]ll portions of an act must be read in pari materia, and every word, clause and sentence of it must be considered so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.