Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 P2D 774 - Wilhite v. State

Wilhite v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 1996
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Kitchens v. State · Cooper v. State · Nauni v. State · Ray v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all criminal cases the prosecution and the defendant are entitled to the following peremptory challenges: Provided, that if two or more defendants are tried jointly they shall join in their challenges; provided, that when two or more defendants have inconsistent defenses they shall be granted separate challenges for each defendant as hereinafter set forth....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.