Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 So. 2d 1350 - State v. Armstrong

701 So. 2d 1350 - State v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dorthey · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square · State v. Hogan · 691 So. 2d 345 - State v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendant abused a position of trust and responsibility for his own perverted sexual interests without regard to the lifelong harm he could cause to the victim. There is no excuse, justification or mitigation for such misconduct. On the showing made, we do not find an abuse of discretion. The sentence is not constitutionally excessive and is adequately supported by the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.