Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 SO2D 314 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2011

13 state decisions

90199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Star Steel Co. v. Thomas · Midland Central Appraisal District v. Midland Industrial Service Corp. · Toski v. McDonnell · Ex Parte Frith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The statement of specific grounds of objection waives all grounds not specified and the trial court will not be put in error on grounds not assigned at trial.' Ex parte Frith, 526 So.2d 880 , 882 (Ala. 1987).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[W]e will not make exception to the rule that a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel may not be considered on appeal if it was not first presented to the trial court.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““ ‘Review on appeal is limited to a consideration of questions properly raised in the trial court. Knox v. State, 38 Ala.App. 482 , 87 So.2d 671 (1956); Handley v. State, 214 Ala. 172 , 106 So. 692 (1926). Matters not objected to in the trial court cannot be considered for the first time on appeal since review on appeal is limited to those matters on which rulings are invoked at nisi prius. Daniels v. State, 53 Ala.App. 666 , 303 So.2d 166 (1974); Shiver v. State, 49 Ala.App. 615 , 274 So.2d 644 (1973); Cooper v. State, Ala.App., 331 So.2d 752 , cert. denied, Ala., 331 So.2d 759 (1976).’ “Harris v. State, 347 So.2d 1363, 1367 (Ala.Cr.App.1977), cert. denied, 347 So.2d 1368 (emphasis in original).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.