Kumpe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
71 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 780 So. 2d 1284 - Murphy's Lease & Welding Service, Inc. v. Bayou Concessions Salvage, Inc. (2001), 732 So. 2d 530 - Jackson v. Colvin (1998)
71 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. · Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLE · 635 So. 2d 219 - Fontenot v. Fontenot · Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific · 692 So. 2d 524 - Haywood v. Louisiana Sugar Cane Products
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and that mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) The trial court erred in granting summary judgment because material issues of fact remained as to whether Natchitoches Beverage qualified as an “employer” under La.R.S. 46:2253(7). (2) The trial court erred by granting summary judgment when it ruled that La.R.S. 46:2253(7) did not apply to the sale of beer to the State of Louisiana through Northwestern State University and the United States Government through the Army. (3) The trial court erred by granting summary judgment when it failed to retroactively apply Acts 1997, No. 1409, § 4, which redefined the definition of “employer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.