Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 SO2D 545 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 751 So. 2d 537 - Goodwin v. State (1999), Trease v. State (2000)

59 state decisions

350199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Payne v. Tennessee · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Henderson v. Brown · McKinney v. Baldwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Limitation of cross-examination is subject to an abuse of discretion standard.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “error has not resulted in a miscarriage of justice but the state has failed to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no reasonable possibility that the error affected the jury verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the only matters that may be asserted in aggravation are those set out in the death penalty statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.