701 So. 2d 706 - State v. Forrest’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Michelson v. United States · David W. McKay v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mr. Forrest's pre-trial speech and his letter are certainly a lay person's attempt to object to the trial court's failure to rule on his motion to quash. Further, Mr. Forrest complained about his counsel's failure to act on his behalf. This is not the usual case where the defendant appears to acquiesce because he does nothing; here Mr. Forrest raised the issue and was ignored.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[o]ur job is to seek justice. His job is to defend, to get someone off, in other words, to put them on the street where they can strike again.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“but in no case shall the state have less than one year after the ruling to commence the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Blazio
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.