Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 701 So. 2d 829 - Wallace v. State

701 So. 2d 829 - Wallace v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2015

8 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ellis v. United States · 652 So. 2d 198 - Ex Parte Walker · 598 So. 2d 1040 - Rose v. State · 659 So. 2d 152 - Wilson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In criminal cases, the trial court has jurisdiction over a motion for a new trial if it is filed within 30 days after the entry of the judgment or sentence even if a notice of appeal is also filed, regardless of the order in which the motion and notice of appeal are filed. Walker v. State, 652 So.2d 198 (Ala.1994); Ala.Code 1975, § 12-22-133; Rule 4(b)(1), Ala. R.App. P; and Rule 24, Ala. R.Crim. P. Therefore, the appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas was timely filed and, even though notice of appeal had been given prior to its filing, the trial court retained jurisdiction to consider the motion. Therefore, the trial court erred in ruling that the notice of appeal rendered the motion to withdraw the guilty pleas moot.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A motion to withdraw a guilty plea is the functional equivalent of a motion for a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.