¶1Appellant, Eugene Clark, appeals from his conviction and sentence for armed kidnapping, armed robbery, and armed burglary. We affirm in all respects, but we reverse Appellant’s sentence and remand for resen-tencing. Since there was no evidence presented at trial that Appellant had personally used a weapon in committing the crimes charged, it was error for the trial court to enhance Appellant’s sentence based on the fact that co-defendants used a firearm during the commission of the crimes charged. See State v. Rodriguez, 602 So.2d 1270, 1272*913(Fla.1992); Williams v. State, 622 So.2d 456, 465 (Fla.1993).
¶2AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.