Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 702 F.2d 1252 - Tapco Nigeria Ltd. v. M/V Westwind

Tapco Nigeria Ltd. v. M/V Westwind’s Empirical Analysis

702 F.2d 1252 · 1983

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Servicios-Expoarma, C.A. v. Industrial Maritime Carriers, Inc. (1998), Mannesman Demag Corporation,-, v. M/v Concert Express, Etc., et al. (2000)

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schnell v. The Vallescura · Constable v. National Steamship Co. · Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. · Allied Chemical Corporation v. Hess Tankship Company of Delaware · Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. California Stevedore & Ballast Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unload the cargo onto a dock, segregate it by bill of lading and count, put it in a place of rest on the pier so that it is accessible to the consignee, and afford the consignee a reasonable opportunity to come and get it.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “properly provided safe delivery to the farthest point that it could delivery [sic] the goods within the limitations of the law, custom, and usage of the port.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]ny other cause arising without the actual fault and privity of the carrier and without the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.