Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 702 F.2d 133 - United States v. Young

United States v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

702 F.2d 133 · 1983

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably United States v. Blackman (1990), United States v. Hutchings (1984)

50 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

260198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1153

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Jenkins v. United States · United States v. Skillman · Hodges v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 609. Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime (a) General rule. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record during cross-examination but only if the crime (1) was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year under the law under which he was convicted, and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to the defendant * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “results in waiver of objection on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.