United States v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
702 F.2d 33 · 1983
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2015 · most notably United States v. Inadi (1986), United States v. Persico (1987)
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Santoni v. United States · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Babich v. United States · Roberts v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) (quoting Glosser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 74-75 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 467 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942)), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 992 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 680 , 461 U.S. 931 , 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 (1983); United States v. Perez, 702 F.2d 33, 35 (2d Cir.) (Geaney finding as to the existence of a conspiratorial relationship between the declarant and the defendant must be shown aliunde of the hearsay statement itself), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2457 , 77 L.Ed.2d 336 (1983); United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 136-37 (2d Cir.1982) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“has proved participation in the conspiracy, by the defendant against whom the hearsay is offered, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, independent of the hearsay utterances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an implicit Geaney ruling can be inferred in the trial judge's decision to receive the evidence and to deny a directed verdict of acquittal on the conspiracy charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.