Young v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
702 F.3d 489 · 2013
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
November 2014
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Finch v. Astrue · Kirby v. Sullivan · Groeper v. Sullivan · Kluesner v. Astrue · Nimick v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance but is enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the Commissioner’s conclusion. In determining whether existing evidence is substantial, we consider evidence that detracts from the Commissioner’s decision as well as evidence that supports it. As long as substantial evidence in the record supports the Commissioner’s decision, we may not reverse it because substantial evidence exists in the record that would have supported a contrary outcome, or because we would have decided the case differently.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cline v. Colvin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.