In re Sealed Case’s Empirical Analysis
702 F.3d 59 · 2012
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (§ 112 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000) · 18 U.S.C. § 1593 (§ 112 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000) · 18 U.S.C. § 2259 (§ 40113 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. United States · Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States · United States v. Rodgers · United States v. Monzel · United States v. Oladimeji
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] 'waiver of the right to appeal a sentence is presumptively valid and is enforceable if the defendant's decision to waive is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the defendant is aware of and understands the risks involved in his decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We compensate a victim with restitution, that is money-whether she chooses to use the money in a particular way is up to her.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.