Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 702 F.3d 785 - Gonzalez v. Seal

Gonzalez v. Seal’s Empirical Analysis

702 F.3d 785 · 2012

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
September 2021
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Jones v. Bock · Woodford v. Ngo · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle · Underwood v. Wilson · Fisher v. Halliburton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[FJailure to exhaust is an affirmative defense under the PLRA, and ... inmates are not required to specially plead or demonstrate exhaustion in their complaints.”). 35 . “[A]n allegation is considered denied or avoided” when”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “District courts have no discretion to excuse a prisoner's failure to properly exhaust the prison grievance process before filing their complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.