Duffy v. Sarault’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Morrissey v. Brewer · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Railway Company v. Whitton's Administrator
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“City of Pawtucket, Personnel Rules and Regulations, Rule III, Section 7 (emphasis added). 62 As the appellants suggest, the use of the word”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duffy v. Sarault“on Central Avenue in Pawtucket at which time Mr. Jeffers said something to the effect that things are going to be different”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duffy v. Sarault“[d]irect evidence of retaliatory firings is rare; facts in these cases must often be inferred from the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duffy v. Sarault
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.