Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 702 NW2D 268 - State v. Houston

State v. Houston’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
7
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Ring v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “known as the `watershed rule' exception, applies when the new rule `requires the observance of those procedures that * * * are implicit in the concept of ordered liberty' or `alter our understanding of the bedrock procedural elements that must be found to vitiate the fairness of any particular conviction.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We are hard-pressed to see how a rule that, when violated, merely requires re-sentencing can be said to be one without which the likelihood of an accurate conviction is seriously diminished.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “whether `reasonable jurists hearing petitioner's claim at *Page 459 the time his conviction became final would have felt compelled by existing precedent to rule in his favor.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.