State v. Houston’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
7
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Ring v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“known as the `watershed rule' exception, applies when the new rule `requires the observance of those procedures that * * * are implicit in the concept of ordered liberty' or `alter our understanding of the bedrock procedural elements that must be found to vitiate the fairness of any particular conviction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Danforth v. State“We are hard-pressed to see how a rule that, when violated, merely requires re-sentencing can be said to be one without which the likelihood of an accurate conviction is seriously diminished.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Smart“whether `reasonable jurists hearing petitioner's claim at *Page 459 the time his conviction became final would have felt compelled by existing precedent to rule in his favor.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Danforth v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.