Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 702 P2D 1025 - Liles v. State

Liles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
3
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably State v. Bland (1997), Cartwright v. Maynard (1987)

6 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

2601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ake v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not the first drug to be used in therapy for most patients with non-psychotic anxiety because certain risks associated with its use are not shared by common alternative treatments.... When used in the treatment of non-psychotic anxiety [it] should not be administered in doses of not [sic] more than 100 mg. per day....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Liles v. Saffle
  2. “and indicate that the doctors entertained serious concern about his mental stability.... [T]he doctor's concern about [petitioner's] mental condition was further illustrated by the fact that the psychiatric report suggested that [petitioner] be referred”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Liles v. Saffle
  3. “to a mental health clinic in his locale for follow-up care on an out-patient basis as might be indicated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Liles v. Saffle

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.