White v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2012
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Cooper v. State · Cobbs v. State · Ray v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This Court stated in Blair v. State, 55 Okl.Cr. 280 , 29 P.2d 998, 999 (1934) (Syllabi No. 1) that: [T]he jurat is simply evidence of the fact that the affidavit was duly sworn to by the affiant, and, in the event of its omission, the fact that the affidavit was properly sworn to may be proven by other evidence. This Court held there that the defect was cured when the defendant called affiant and proved that he had sworn to the affidavit.” White v. State, 702 P.2d 1058, 1061 (Okl.Cr.1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gannaway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.