Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

702 S.E.2d 303

Rice v. COHOLAN

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 2010

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2010-10-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2019

2 state decisions

Relies on 205 N.C. App. 103 - Rice v. COHOLAN

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

J. Frederick RICE and wife, Donna Rice, and Douglas K. Bradley,
v.
Donald COHOLAN and wife, Teresa Coholan, Madison Development of Charlotte, LLC, John Sadri Custom Homes, Inc., Temple Israel, Inc., Madison Geer, Bryant P. Marks, Nachum Eshet and Wife, Mary Eshet, Gayle L. Smith, Ernie Castellano and Wife, Debbie Castellano, and George S. Crouch, Jr., and Wife, Mary Ann C. Crouch.

No. 346P10.

¶1Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 7, 2010.

¶2Preston O. Odom, III, Charlotte, John R. Buric, Charlotte, for J. Frederick Rice & Donna Rice.

¶3Patrick E. Kelly, Charlotte, for Donald & Teresa Coholan.

¶4Miles S. Levin, for Temple Israel, Inc.

¶5Leslie H. Miller, Charlotte, for George & Mary Ann Crouch.

¶6Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 695 S.E.2d 484.

¶7

*304ORDER

¶8Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of August 2010 by Plaintiff (J. Frederick Rice and Donna Rice) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

¶9"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of October 2010."

/702/se2d/303 · .json · Public domain