Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 702 So. 2d 107 - White v. State

702 So. 2d 107 - White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2015

24 state decisions

140199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin · Bevan v. Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Co. · People v. Robideau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here the two offenses for which the defendant is punished or tried cannot survive the `same-elements' test, the double jeopardy bar applies.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal. It protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction. And it protects against multiple punishments for the same offense.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “White v. State, 702 So.2d 107 , 109 (Miss. 1997) ( quoting North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 , 717, 89 S.Ct. at 2076-77, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969) (footnotes omitted)). ¶ 15. This Court recently addressed the issue of double jeopardy in Cook v. State, 671 So.2d 1327 (Miss. 1996): The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment reads as follows,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.