Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 473 So. 2d 1097 - McLeod v. McLeod · 603 So. 2d 1096 - Shaddix v. Shaddix · 688 So. 2d 862 - Morgan v. Estate of W.D. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“*Page 264 as contemplated by Rule 60(b)(2) means evidence in existence at the time of trial of which the movant was unaware, and which could not through due diligence have been discovered in time to move for a new trial . . . .' McLeod v. McLeod , 473 So.2d 1097 , 1099 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Patterson“Rule 60(b)(2) allows a trial court to relieve a party from a final judgment, order, or proceeding if that party has newly discovered evidence that by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b). `”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Patterson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.