Martin v. Kroger Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · 366 So. 2d 1381 - Burmaster v. Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 2 · Crier v. Whitecloud · Haughton Elevator Division v. STATE, ETC. · 432 So. 2d 256 - Chaney v. State Through Dept. of Health
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All pleadings or documents to be filed in an action or proceeding instituted or pending in a court shall be delivered to the clerk of court for such purpose. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 253. A party obliged to file a pleading within a time limitation must ensure actual delivery, since it is the time when the clerk receives actual delivery which determines whether that pleading has been timely filed. Pelt v. Guardsmark, Inc., 451 So.2d 621 (La. App. 5th Cir.1984).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]s long as the original signed document, and the applicable filing and transmission fees are forwarded to the clerk of court within five days after the clerk has received the transmission, the facsimile when filed has the same force and effect as the original.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the statute makes the effectiveness of such a filing conditional upon the subsequent delivery of the original pleading to the clerk within five days of the transmission date,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.