Blue v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 23, 1997

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-12-23

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2017

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The trial court erred by revoking appellant's probation for violation of a condition which was added without a hearing and without representation of counsel. The order of modification entered on May 3, 1996, is VACATED. The order of revocation of probation entered on November 19, 1996, nunc pro tunc November 4, 1996, is also VACATED. The judgment and sentence entered on November 4, 1996, are REVERSED.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 744 So. 2d 543 - Blue v. State

Relies on 579 So. 2d 109 - Clark v. State · 603 So. 2d 1353 - Russo v. State · 605 So. 2d 456 - State v. Rock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-12-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BARFIELD, Chief Judge.

¶1The trial court erred by revoking appellant’s probation for violation of a condition which was added without a hearing and without representation of counsel, State v. Rock, 605 So.2d 456 (Fla.1992); Clark v. State, 579 So.2d 109 (Fla.1991); Dennis v. State, 630 So.2d 605 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Russo v. State, 603 So.2d 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

¶2The order of modification entered on May 3, 1996, is VACATED. The order of revocation of probation entered on November 19, 1996, nunc pro tunc November 4, 1996, is also VACATED. The judgment and sentence entered on November 4, 1996, are REVERSED.

KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.