Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 702 So. 2d 803 - State v. Coleman

702 So. 2d 803 - State v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Rugendorf v. United States · Herrmann v. United States · Alexander v. Virginia · State v. Dotson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where evidence provided by an informant is so vital to the State's indictment as to render the charges inconsequential without it, disclosure of the informant's identity is necessary to protect the defendant's right of confrontation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is a point in dispute. [2] The record does establish, however, only CI-106 and Moore were familiar with each other. Asked what happened when he first approached the car in which Baker and CI-106 were sitting, Moore testified CI-106 asked for defendant by name. Baker subsequently handed Moore $50.00. Moore apparently left, obtained $50.00 worth of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “at the Warren Miller Subdivision in Cameron Parish. The operation's supervisor was Deputy Michael Hebert, who on that particular evening worked with two agents, including Garfield Baker of Texas (hereinafter referred to as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.