Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 703 F.2d 1141 - Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water District

Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Empirical Analysis

703 F.2d 1141 · 1983

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2002 · most notably First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles (1987), Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz (1987)

42 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

510198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc. · Agins v. City of Tiburon · Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency · San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San Diego

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ll 'evidence and factual inferences' must be viewed in the light most favorable to the adverse party and the summary judgment may be upheld only if 'there are no genuine issues of material fact and [the movant is] entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[O]nce a court establishes that there was a regulatory ‘taking,’ the Constitution demands that the government entity pay just compensation for the period commencing on the date the regulation first effected the ‘taking,’ and ending on the date the government entity chooses to rescind or otherwise amend the regulation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “While ‘the contours of municipal liability under § 1983 ... are currently in a state of evolving definition and uncertainty’ [citations], an action for damages under section 1983 for overregulation of land was recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in Lake Country Estates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.